Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: paths to templates

Posted by william on Wed Apr 14 15:37:32 1999

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: paths to templates posted by TimJ on April 14, 1999 at 14:58:50:

>At 01:28 PM 4/14/99 +0100, William Chesters wrote:
>>In any case I hope Chippy wasn't proposing hardwiring the directory
>>name into 1000 different places in the source :) ?

>This confuses me. We have to hardwire the directory name in the
>source where-ever we load in a template anyway, don't we? Oh, are
>you saying that we don't have to do that 1000 times, just 10?
>Certainly true.

Traditional "good practice" would be to put the directory
name in precisely once in a named constant ... however I'm
not seriously suggesting that.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: paths to templates Myles Wed Apr 14 16:01:45 1999 (0)



---

Post a Followup

Name:

E-Mail:

Copy:

Circulation: Airflow AlexH Catalyst Chameleon ColinR DanielH JackM JennyP JohnR KeithH KiraB KrugerD MikeC MylesC NicR PatickG RachelG TimJ TimP WilliamC WilliamS paneris

Subject:

>>At 01:28 PM 4/14/99 +0100, William Chesters wrote: >>>In any case I hope Chippy wasn't proposing hardwiring the directory >>>name into 1000 different places in the source :) ? >>This confuses me. We have to hardwire the directory name in the >>source where-ever we load in a template anyway, don't we? Oh, are >>you saying that we don't have to do that 1000 times, just 10? >>Certainly true. >Traditional "good practice" would be to put the directory >name in precisely once in a named constant ... however I'm >not seriously suggesting that.

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post a Followup ] [ Discussions at the Paneris newbox node ]