Posted by TimJ on Thu Sep 10 5:08:46 1998
In Reply to: Re: Change of standard rate posted by TimJ on September 04, 1998 at 12:39:12:
| Distribution: | paneris@i-way.co.uk | lurker@paneris.co.uk |
|---|
>I am doing all my work on PanEris, and so have a few
>contracts which perhaps I should be back filling the
>Paneris Fund with.excellent idea
>Well, re-reading the people page,
>it seems that the current understanding is that only money from I-way
>should go into the pot, because of the history.chippy also has a project of dubious origins which he is contributing to paneris. Jenny is working directly for bloomsbury and will also pay 10% into the fund for this customer.
>The other reading is that only jobs which are brought to the team,
>ie shared out with other Paneris /people.Not sure what you mean.
>So using current charges,
>Programmer cost 32
>Finders fee 4
>Project lead 2
>Paneris fund 2
>========================
>Programmer charge out 40!!! How did you arrive at this, I have recently posted to /system about how I see the new charging structure.
notes on above:
if there is to be a contribution to paneris fund it should come as a cut in the finders fee, not the management fee (which strugles to cover costs at present).
Programmer cost 33.33
Finders fee 3.33
Project lead 3.33
========================
Programmer charge out 40is how I see things
>The question is, on one man projects, should the paneris fund
>be receiving 5%.only if the finders fee can not be justified.
>This means that the project lead recieves
>5% more than the programmer.? don't understand what you mean.
>Which projects does or should this apply to, other than the
>known ones of /partners/iway ?see above
this message xposted to /system
>yours
>timP