Posted by TimJ on Thu Sep 10 5:08:46 1998
In Reply to: Re: Addressees on Message boards posted by Myles on September 03, 1998 at 13:19:10:
| Distribution: | paneris@i-way.co.uk | lurker@paneris.co.uk |
|---|
>[snipped - reasons not to dump multiboard]>Agree with this.
>E-mail clients, to my mind, are the best way to receive and reply
>to messages. We already receive multiboard messages by e-mail, but
>having to go on-line and to the appropriate web page and (re-)setting
>the distribution before even thinking of typing in words is inefficient.>I agree, though, that just using e-mail (not getting it onto the web
>somehow) can lead to problems. But that doesn't mean the only other
>way to do it is via a web browser. In short, I think we need CoCoBoard
>or HyperNews feature to automatically post an incoming e-mail to a
>forum of some sort will be a huge boon to me.ABSOLUTELY AGREE
>Agree, although I would like to see some justification, FROM ANYONE, of why
>openness is good. I fully agree that we need to open amongst ourselves (so
>that we know what is going on and can jump into projects) and I understand
>that we can use openness as a box to tick to impress some (open?) organisations,
>but is all openness good? (Some of our customer's pages already have password
>protection).openness gets us business.
openness is what paneris is about.
openness allows us to run things more effeciently.
openness is objectively good.
TimJ